ETH/316 Values and Cultural Responsibility
April 21, 2014
Ethics is recognized as a system of moral values, beliefs that have an effect on how persons live their lives and make alternatives. Ethics may be the concerned with the examination and study of human actions as it relates to the right and wrongness of the actions. There are many different ideas associated with integrity, the purpose of this essay is always to briefly describe, compare and discuss the similarities and differences between three moral theories: advantage ethics, utilitarianism and deontology. Utilitarianism Ethics
The basic tenant of Utilitarianism ethics is that the action a single takes is usually morally right when it is necessary for the greatest number of people. Another way to communicate this believed is, " The greatest good for the greatest volume of people” (Boylan, 2009, s. 153). When ever taking these actions the smoothness of the individual described. Deontological Integrity
This theory emphasizes responsibility to an actions or pursuing rules, since the action on its own is innately right. Additionally , the Deontology theory is definitely not focused on the results of the actions; it is the motives behind the action that determine if they are right or wrong. In order to help be familiar with concept, normally a subset with the theory can be referenced; named Divine Command Theory. Keen Command Theory states that God's commands are the method to obtain all integrity and that The almighty is a moral authority, so we should comply with and abide by his commands. Therefore , Gods commands will be inherently right, so we have to follow all of them. Virtue Integrity
The central theme of Advantage Ethics is the fact we should develop and target excellence in all that we carry out. The theory is usually not concerned with the results of the action. In other words, providing you are attaining is brilliance there is no big difference between the accomplishment of good or perhaps bad. In addition , the theory considers the personality and figure of a person over the lengthy view of history. It makes allowance for mistakes in judgment; as long as they are not consistently element of a person's habits of character. Comparing Theories
Next we will look at and assess a few basic thoughts on three major ideas previously explained. Virtue Values stresses the virtues of striving for brilliance, taking actions regardless of the consequences, based on ethical character. In comparison, Deontology is targeted on the responsibilities and motivation behind the action used. Deontology is definitely not focused on the benefits of the action; it is the motives behind the action that matter. Basically is the actions itself must be inherently proper. Utilitarian highlights that the outcomes of the actions must be taken into consideration and that the action must be pertaining to the good from the majority of people. Another way to compare the suggestions is to consider the different ways that they consider the actions considered. For supporters of the Practical theory, it's the taking action for the great of all that defines the smoothness of the person. In the case of Deontology, it is the causes behind currently taking action that matter; it's the following of rules define the character. And then for Virtue Values it is a couple of an action that creates superiority and achievement that define the smoothness. The Relationship between Virtue, Beliefs and Meaning Concepts
The concept of virtue, values and meaningful concepts happen to be interconnected and frequently it is difficult to identify one from the other. Benefits are individuals internal features or great traits which have been thought of as excellent or morally good. Probe are those principles or habits which are thought to reflect the right and wrong of conduct by majority of people. Morals will be defined simply by external options while benefits come from the interior person. Principles are a group of measurements that serve as the foundation for a ethical compass where action is usually taken. Personal Experience
At times something could happen in life...
Recommendations: Boylan, M. (2009). Fundamental Ethics for: Basic Values (2nd ed. ). Upper Saddle Riv, NJ: Pearson Eduction.
Griffin, J. (1996). Value Reasoning: Improving the Ethical Morals. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press.
Hursthouse, Rosalind, " Virtue Ethics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed. ), WEB ADDRESS =.
Deontology. (2007). In Political philosophy A-Z. Retrieved from
Slote, Meters. (1998). Just how Should 1 Live?: Essays on the Benefits. New York, NY: Oxford College or university Press.
Utilitarianism. (2001). In Dictionary of world philosophy. Retrieved by
Advantage ethics. (2002). In A book of idea, MacMillan. Gathered from